English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article aims to analyze the procedural illegitimacy of the method provided in the Brazilian Children and Adolescents Statute about collecting testimony evidences in the infraction investigation legal process. Through a deductive system, the aim is to highlight the possibility of presenting the teenager and hearing the witnesses in unique hearing, as currently applied in the criminal sphere. For this purpose, initially, it was explained, under the principle of procedural economy, the relevance of an agile legal procedure. Also questioned if the system provided by Law number 8.069/90, whichsp lits the instruction acts, avoids the excessive length of the probationary instruction and accomplish, in the most expeditious manner, the procedural deadlines provided by that same law. In a second moment, it was analyzed the principle of orality and the principle of concentration of teenager infraction legal processing, as well as its consequences. That assessment is connected directly to the principle of presumption of innocence in the face of frequent assumption of guilt by the teenager in the legal process. At the end, we concluded the illegitimacy of the audience splittingto take oral proof in the teenager infraction legal process, revealing the needing of a unique audience.

revista da esmesc

Audiência una em processo de apuração de ato infracional: análise do sistema processual previsto na Lei 8.069/90 sob o crivo de princípios constitucionais consagrados também na Lei n°11.719/08