English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper sets out to examine the neo-conservative experiment to which British Columbia was subjected in the three-year period between 1983 and 1986, and to explore the root causes of the pursuit of such policies in an essentially peripheral region within a larger capitalist economy. For while neo-conservatism as an ideology gained ascendancy in the two core English-speaking countries in the late 1970s and early 1980s, it is striking to note that in a country such as Canada it proved more influential at the regional than at the national level. Why should this have been so, and what lessons can we derive from the attempt to administer the bitter medicine of public sector roll-backs and social spending cuts within the confines of a single province? This paper will begin with a brief discussion of the reasons for the emergence of neo-conservatism in the 1970s. It will then say something about the particular nature of state activity in resource-based economies like B.C.'s and of political culture in this province. This will be followed by an examination of the policies which the newly re-elected Social Credit government of the province introduced in July 1983, the reaction these engendered, and the larger impact that the B.C. experience may have had within and outside the province.

Neo-Conservatism on the Periphery: The Lessons from B.C.