English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Tanulmanyomban a birak altal feltett kerdesek tipusait vizsgalom a tanuk es szakertők befolyasolasanak es befolyasolhatosaganak szempontjabol, a magyar tanu- es szakertői bizonyitasokban betoltott komplex szerepukből kiindulva. A vizsgalat korpuszat 16 targyalas alkotja, fele-fele aranyban buntető es polgari peres eljaras. Ezek kozul 13 targyalast diktafonnal rogzitettem, igy osszesen 22 ora 14 perc hangfelvetelt es a tovabbi 3 targyalas soran keszitett irasbeli jegyzetet elemeztem egy komplex szempontrendszer alapjan: a konverzacioelemzes modszereit otvoztem funkcionalis pragmatikai nezetekkel, valamint jogi es pszichologiai ismeretekre is szukseg volt. Vizsgaltam az agens kihagyasanak a szerepet, a kerdesek preszuppozicioit, valamint a preferenciarendszer szerveződeset a valaszadas es annak elmaradasa, a tipuskonform es nem tipuskonform valaszadas, es a megerősites vagy cafolas tekinteteben. A kihallgatasok kereteben feltett kerdesek tipusait egyarant vizsgaltam jogi es nyelveszeti keretben, s e kettőt egyesitve egy arnyaltabb, osszegzett kerdestipologiat is felvazoltam. In my paper, I investigate the types of questions asked by judges in the Hungarian courtroom discourses regarding their role how they could or could not influence witnesses and experts in the course of complex testimony and evidence. The corpus is made up of 16 trials, half of which are civil, the other half criminal. 13 of these trials were recorded - 22 hours and 14 minutes of recording in total - and three other trials were observed with written notes about them. I use a complex method to analyze these discourses based on conversation analysis combined with functional pragmatics. However, psychological and judicial knowledge was also necessary in addition to linguistics approach. In the present paper, I especially concentrate on the importance of agent omission, presuppositions in questions, and the preference organization with respect to answers over nonanswer responses, type-conformity over nonconformity, and affirmation over disaffirmation. Thus, examining the questions asked during trials in an integrated linguistics and judicial framework, I propose a more reliable and detailed typology of questions.

Bírói kérdésfeltevések a magyar tanú- és szakértői bizonyításokban