English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article aims to assess the conformity of the ontological presuppositions of the crime of abortion with the discourse of human rights. To do so, it proceeds to the case study, through the analysis of four votes of ministers of the Supreme Court delivered the judgment of ADPF 54-DF, which deals with the termination of pregnancy in gestation anencephalic fetuses. Adopt as a theoretical framework the essay Can the Subaltern Speak?, by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, who guides the reflection on the law as a field of dispute for power, the subalternization of women in these disputes and how the ontological presuppositions of a penal norm can be known when observes the representation of subaltern subjects by the institutions of power, evidencing the normative dissimulations that underlie the law.

PODE A MULHER BRASILEIRA FALAR? DISSIMULAÇÕES NORMATIVAS: UMA ANÁLISE DA SUBALTERNIZAÇÃO DAS MULHERES NA ADPF 54-DF