English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In spite of the considerable time lapse since the beginning of the democratic transitions in the Southern Cone countries, the unresolved questions surrounding the grave human rights violations during the military regimes of the 1970s and 1980s continue dominating the political agenda more than expected. This becomes even more apparent when one considers the vitality of the legal and illegal impunity mecanisms established during these regimes. This article explores a comparative panorama of the principal methods adopted by the Argentine, Chilean and Uruguayan governments in response to certain social demands, in a debate that continues to the present, both in a national and an international context.

Dilemas políticos y éticos en torno a las violaciones a los Derechos Humanos en el cono sur