English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this paper is to discard the moral content criticism that has been made to the so-called «The Enemy’s Criminal Law » given its alleged bonds with the interwar’s «Sovereign Decisionism». Rather than entering the debate amongst jurists about whether it is legitimate Law, the suitability of using the jakobsian category will be put forward to characterize totalitarian Criminal Law, in this particular case, early Francoism Criminal law. To start with, some of Franco’s dictatorship punitive techniques will be revised beginning with the elements that nowadays define ‘the Enemy’s Criminal Law in order to defend the usefulness of the concept as a comparable category, not only with today's, but with other historical -isms.

El «derecho penal del enemigo»: de la teoría actual a la práctica represiva del «Nuevo Estado» franquista