English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the Middle Ages, community politics were neither the exclusive nor sole product of the subjugated’s direct action but the dominants’ answer to discussion of the privileged power positions they occupied (in fact, this can be also affirmed of any other period not only of the Middle Ages). Evidently, this statement does not pretend to deny the subjugated’s capacity of action but to underline the dominants’ involvement, and the causes of this involvement, in a political action framework of the type «common good». Thus, for the dominants embracing community politics or common good politics was another strategy in the process of consolidating both domination itself and their specific participation in it. In this sense, this study will focus on the way in which Cuenca’s dominant class core, that is the regidores, sponsored «common good» political actions, transforming in this manner the perception that about their management (of urban politics and power) had the rest of the urban society.

Legitimando la dominación en la Cuenca del siglo XV: la transformación de los intereses particulares a través de la definición del bien común