English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Media have been given an outstanding relevance to combat gender violence. The aim of this article is to discuss the limitations of the current hegemonic mode of recognition of gender-based violence if we want to update media discourse in order to deepen in the reality of the phenomenon and contribute to social change. A qualitative approach has been developed to put in the center of the research those journalists that make, frame and select gender-based violence news stories. 17 semi-structured interviews were made and, through discourse analysis, we analyze how journalists interpellate the subjects of violence in the context of news production. It is argued that the current mode of recognition of gender violence fosters an individualized conception of violence that produces an objectified model of woman-victim considered lacked of agency, who, eventually, is judged responsible of her own situation of violence.

Culpabilización de las víctimas y reconocimiento: límites del discurso mediático sobre la violencia de género