English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolEl presente articulo pretende cuestionar una cierta tendencia a la critica del urbanismo funcionalista llevada a cabo desde una perspectiva funcionalista. Mucha de la critica asi realizada solo conduce a una practica urbanistica consistente en sustituir un programa por otro. Se reivindica la necesidad de ir mas alla, de un cambio real, no solo nominal, del punto de vista. Se reivindica la ciudad compleja, en su imperfeccion y dinamismo, frente a cualquier proyeccion de un proyecto ideal sobre el territorio urbano. La ciudad justa e igualitaria sera compleja o no sera. EnglishThis paper tries to question a certain trend to criticize functionalism in urban planning from a similar functional adapted concepts or points of view. Much of this criticism just leads us to an urban practice which merely introduces changes in the program, worse if only in the domestic scale. It is necessary to look further, looking for a real change, not just in the use of terms. The answer must be the complex city, even if not perfect and difficult to face in its dynamics, avoiding the easier simple answer: to try to project some kind of utopia. The just and equal city will be complex or just won´t be.

¿Qué ciudad ...? Acerca de la necesidad de reformular la pregunta