English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The epistemological basis of the current theory of legal argument is the discursive ethics of Habermas and, ultimately, the Kantian notion of practical rationality. This paradigm is based on a cold reason, which aspires to be neutral, impartial, universal and decontextualized. This approach leaves issues that are central to the argument theory, such as the character of the speaker person, the emotions of the audience or persuasion produced by the aesthetic elements. So, against the Habermasian paradigm, «virtue ethics» could lead to a new point of view of the theory of argumentation that cares about the actual audiences from a notion of the human rationality, coupled with emotion and biography.

¿Es necesario un giro aretaico de la teoría de la argumentación jurídica?