English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Taking as a starting point a critical review of Mexican law philosopher Ulises Schmill’s emblematic writings, we consider the recurring debate concerning retributivism and utilitarianism regarding the justification behind punishment and its relationship with power. A third model, halfway between the absolutism of the ethics of punishment and the subjectivity of ethics of responsibility, is proposed. Such a model is both cooperative and constructivist. From this third model a critique of Schmill’s consequentialism can be made, which alongside Thucydides and Shakespeare’s approaches, allows us to arrive at an alternative proposal.

Nota sobre Los lenguajes de la jurisprudencia, la sociología y la ética, Retribucionismo vs. utilitarismo