English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the present paper I try to conduct a general review of the legal doctrine prevailing in an important part of Iberoamerica, especially regarding the control of the facts that underlie emergency legislation. According to the doctrine under analysis, unless an event, fact, circumstance or situation proves to be objectively verifiable, no emergency law would reunite the conditions to be validated by the judiciary. However, when it comes to understand what such requirement means to the doctrine, some dubious philosophical assumptions will be put on display. My task is twofold: firstly, it is to reconstruct what the doctrine really means by «objectivity»; and, secondly, it is to criticize this notion, for being linked to a hardly appealing value-free conception of the political action.

Emergencia jurídica y objetividad. Reflexiones filosóficas en torno al control judicial del presupuesto habilitante