English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Luck egalitarianism is a family of liberal egalitarian conceptions of justice according to which inequalities that are due to voluntary choice are just whereas those that are due to luck are unjust. This article examines the basic aspects of this position and the main controversies it has created. The first section introduces the context and motivation that lead to the formulation of luck egalitarian conceptions. The second section sketches three ways of reconstructing the debate between luck egalitarians and Rawls. The third section examines the main ideas at the core of luck egalitarianism, namely: (i) the idea of responsibility; (ii) the distinction between brute and option luck; (iii) the issue of the currency. The fourth section analyses the two main criticisms leveled against this approach. Finally, the fifth section concludes by assessing the place of luck egalitarianism in the contemporary debate about distributive justice.

El igualitarismo de la suerte