English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In this paper we will analyze some important argumentative characteristics of the presumption of innocence and the in dubio pro reo in the criminal trial, from the viewpoint of an argumentative system and computational model called «System of Argumentation with Parallel and Subordinated structures» (SAPS). Also, we will show some general aspects about the burden of proof in the Criminal Law and how can be modelled by SAPS. Lastly, we will compare our analysis with other systems.

Inteligencia Artificial, In Dubio Pro Reo y Presunción de Inocencia. Modelando principios del juicio penal mediante un sistema argumentativo