English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The paper reviews the admissibility of expert evidence offered by parties. It argues about three different criteria involved in the task, which are related with the reliability of the information presented, the judge abilities and the characteristics of the judicial arena. It also analyzes if any kind of epistemic paternalism is necessary or if to look for impartial experts solves at least some of the problems originated by the use of expert knowledge on trial.

La admisibilidad de las pruebas periciales y la racionalidad de las decisiones judiciales