English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study broaches the controversial question about the relationships between direct and circumstantial evidence. Specifically, it goes into the analysis of the traditional superiority of the direct evidence and it examines the foundations of the hipovaluation of the circumstantial evidence’s doctrine. In the first part, the study focuses on the critical review of the before mentioned doctrine. Next, it introduces the «equality» between direct and circumstantial evidence’s doctrine. The study finishes taking the author a stand in relation to the two described bodies of doctrine.

Prueba directa vs. prueba indirecta (un conflicto inexistente)