English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The topic of freedom in the legal courts, at least in the North American context, is treated as a working hypothesis, which was first questioned by philosophy, and defended in the legal scope by theorists and philosophers of law. However, in recent years a new front of uncertainty is emerging, regarding the conduct of human freedom; this time through the neural-scientists. Under neurolaw we understand the field of knowledge which purpose is to explore the findings of neural-scientific justice. This study presents the theme of freedom in the context of the courts of justice in their questionable application of neural-scientific formulations, in order to delimit the extent of their use.

La hipótesis de la libertad frente al desafío de la Neurociencia