English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper describes the experiment that the neuroscientifist B. Libet carried out during the 1950s. The conclusions of these experiments have been interpreted as an empirical demonstration of the falseness of free will thesis. Against the determinist interpretation of these experiments (and against the idea that neuroscience can displace philosophy in the debate of these questions), the paper presents two arguments of G. H. von Wrigh t which attempt to show that it is impossible (by conceptual and philosophical reasons) to prove empirically the universal determinism (which is a presumption of the thesis rejecting free will on the basis of arguments of this type) and the imposibility of reducing the mental dimension to the neuronal one.

¿La tercera humillación? (Sobre neurociencia, filosofía y libre albedrío)