English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the mid-19th century, two opposing or complementary views to understand the border came together in the peninsular public space. On the one hand, the Iberian approaches which, supported in geographic studies and reconnaissance trips, questioned the existence of the natural border, interpreted as a monarchical construct based on historical contingencies, not in the common body of the Peninsula. On the other hand, the advancement of the process ofnationalization and consolidation of liberal States, in addition to the new cartographic developments led to a growing interest in delimit the border accurately and on-the-spot in order to exercise sovereignty over the territory and prevent practices of proximity between the bordering populations.

DE LA FRONTERA CUESTIONADA A LA FRONTERA CONSTRUIDA. IBERISMOS Y ESTADO-NACIÓN EN EL SIGLO XIX