English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The analytical and comparative study of the c. 36 among the pseudo-Iliberritan collection reveals that this text bans the pictorial representations related to the saints’ cult. It also demonstrates that, as the other two precepts of the «martyrial trilogy» —c. 34 and 35— in this series, it must be dated to the end of 4th century or the beginning of the 5th. According to such a chronology and hermeneutics, it seems clear that its formulation tries to avoid the anthropomorphous representations which started to proliferate in Christian cultual buildings. In line with the ancient Hebrew and Christian tradition, the «conservative» trend embodied in c. 36 would be declining before the «idolatrous» offensive supported by the complicity of many ecclesiastics who defended its didactic function and strengthened by the massive attendance to Christianism which resulted into a growth of the martyrial phenomenon.

Placvit pictvras in ecclesia esse non debere: la prohibición del C. 36 pseudoiliberritano