English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Citations measure the importance of a publication, and may serve as a proxyfor its popularity and quality of its contents. Here we study the distributionsof citations to publications from individual academic institutions for a singleyear. The average number of citations have large variations between differentinstitutions across the world, but the probability distributions of citationsfor individual institutions can be rescaled to a common form by scaling thecitations by the average number of citations for that institution. We find thisfeature seem to be universal for a broad selection of institutions irrespectiveof the average number of citations per article. A similar analysis forcitations to publications in a particular journal in a single year revealssimilar results. We find high absolute inequality for both these sets, Ginicoefficients being around $0.66$ and $0.58$ for institutions and journalsrespectively. We also find that the top $25$% of the articles hold about $75$%of the total citations for institutions and the top $29$% of the articles holdabout $71$% of the total citations for journals.

Universality of citation distributions for academic institutions and journals