English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background    Clostridium difficile  is the main cause of nosocomial diarrhea, but is also found in asymptomatic subjects that are potentially involved in transmission of  C. difficile  infection. A sensitive and accurate detection method of  C. difficile , especially toxigenic strains is indispensable for the epidemiological investigation.    Methods  TaqMan-based quantitative-PCR (qPCR) method for targeting 16S rRNA,  tcdB , and  tcdA  genes of  C. difficile  was developed. The detection limit and accuracy of qPCR were evaluated by analyzing stool samples spiked with known amounts of  C. difficile . A total of 235 stool specimens collected from 82 elderly nursing home residents were examined by qPCR, and the validity was evaluated by comparing the detection result with that by  C. difficile  selective culture (CDSC).    Results  The analysis of  C. difficile -spiked stools confirmed that qPCR quantified whole  C. difficile  (TcdA + TcdB + , TcdA − TcdB + , and TcdA − TcdB −  types), TcdB-producing strains (TcdA + TcdB +  and TcdA − TcdB +  types), and TcdA-producing strains (TcdA + TcdB +  type), respectively, with a lower detection limit of 10 3  cells/g of stool. Of the 235 specimens examined, 12 specimens (5.1%) were  C. difficile -positive by qPCR: TcdA + TcdB +  strain in six specimens and TcdA − TcdB −  strain in the other six. CDSC detected  C. difficile  in 9 of the 12 specimens, and toxigenic types of the isolates from the 9 specimens were consistent with those identified by qPCR, supporting the validity of our qPCR method. Moreover, the qPCR examination revealed that the carriage rate of whole  C. difficile  and that of toxigenic strains in the 82 subjects over a 6-month period ranged from 2.4 to 6.8% and 1.2 to 3.8%, respectively. An average qPCR count of  C. difficile  detected was 10 4.5  cells/g of stool, suggesting that  C. difficile  constituted a very small fraction of intestinal microbiota.    Conclusion  Our qPCR method should be an effective tool for both clinical diagnosis and epidemiological investigation of  C. difficile .

Development of TaqMan-Based Quantitative PCR for Sensitive and Selective Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Human Stools