z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An Open Randomized Comparison of Gatifloxacin versus Cefixime for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Enteric Fever
Author(s) -
Anil Pandit,
Amit Arjyal,
Jeremy Day,
Buddhi Paudyal,
Sabina Dangol,
Mark Zimmerman,
Bharat K. Yadav,
Kasia Stepniewska,
James Campbell,
Christiane Dolecek,
Jeremy Farrar,
Buddha Basnyat
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
plos one
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.99
H-Index - 332
ISSN - 1932-6203
DOI - 10.1371/journal.pone.0000542
Subject(s) - medicine , cefixime , gatifloxacin , hazard ratio , randomized controlled trial , randomization , confidence interval , odds ratio , adverse effect , surgery , ceftriaxone , antibiotics , ciprofloxacin , biology , microbiology and biotechnology
Objective To assess the efficacy of gatifloxacin versus cefixime in the treatment of uncomplicated culture positive enteric fever. Design A randomized, open-label, active control trial with two parallel arms. Setting Emergency Room and Outpatient Clinics in Patan Hospital, Lagankhel, Lalitpur, Nepal. Participants Patients with clinically diagnosed uncomplicated enteric fever meeting the inclusion criteria. Interventions Patients were allocated to receive one of two drugs, Gatifloxacin or Cefixime. The dosages used were Gatifloxacin 10 mg/kg, given once daily for 7 days, or Cefixime 20 mg/kg/day given in two divided doses for 7 days. Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was fever clearance time. The secondary outcome measure was overall treatment failure (acute treatment failure and relapse). Results Randomization was carried out in 390 patients before enrollment was suspended on the advice of the independent data safety monitoring board due to significant differences in both primary and secondary outcome measures in the two arms and the attainment of a priori defined endpoints. Median (95% confidence interval) fever clearance times were 92 hours (84–114 hours) for gatifloxacin recipients and 138 hours (105–164 hours) for cefixime-treated patients (Hazard Ratio[95%CI] = 2.171 [1.545–3.051], p<0.0001). 19 out of 70 (27%) patients who completed the 7 day trial had acute clinical failure in the cefixime group as compared to 1 out of 88 patients (1%) in gatifloxacin group(Odds Ratio [95%CI] = 0.031 [0.004 – 0.237], p<0.001). Overall treatment failure patients (relapsed patients plus acute treatment failure patients plus death) numbered 29. They were determined to be (95% confidence interval) 37.6 % (27.14%–50.2%) in the cefixime group and 3.5% (2.2%–11.5%) in the gatifloxacin group (HR[95%CI] = 0.084 [0.025–0.280], p<0.0001). There was one death in the cefixime group. Conclusions Based on this study, gatifloxacin is a better treatment for uncomplicated enteric fever as compared to cefixime. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN75784880

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom