English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Open

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Insights

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Compressive imagers acquire images, or other optical scene information, by a series of spatially filtered intensity measurements, where the total number of measurements required depends on the desired image quality. Compressive imaging (CI) offers a versatile approach to optical sensing which can improve size, weight, and performance (SWaP) for multispectral imaging or feature-based optical sensing. Here we report the first (to our knowledge) systematic performance comparison of a CI system to a conventional focal plane imager for binary, grayscale, and natural light (visible color and infrared) scenes. We generate 1024×1024 images from a range of measurements (0.1%-100%) acquired using digital (Hadamard), grayscale (discrete cosine transform), and random (Noiselet) CI basis sets. Comparing the outcome of the compressive images to conventionally acquired images, each made using 1% of full sampling, we conclude that the Hadamard Transform offered the best performance and yielded images with comparable aesthetic quality and slightly higher spatial resolution than conventionally acquired images.

Characterization of a compressive imaging system using laboratory and natural light scenes