English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Today's peer review process for scientific articles is unnecessarily opaqueand offers few incentives to referees. Likewise, the publishing process isunnecessarily inefficient and its results are only rarely made freely availableto the public. Here we outline a comparatively simple extension of arXiv.org,an online preprint archive widely used in the mathematical and physicalsciences, that addresses both of these problems. Under the proposal, editorsinvite referees to write public and signed reviews to be attached to the postedpreprints, and then elevate selected articles to "published" status.

Extending ArXiv.org to Achieve Open Peer Review and Publishing