English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Copyright ?? 2016. The Johns Hopkins University Press. This article first appeared in Philosophy and Literature, Volume 40, Issue 1, April 2016, pp 240-264For Wittgenstein, ethics cannot be put into words. This does not mean he thought ethics cannot be made manifest; indeed, he took the best manifestation of ethics to occur in aesthetics, and more specifically in literature. Wittgenstein takes us some way toward fleshing out literature???s ???perspicuous presentations,??? but not far enough. To do this, I appeal to F. R. Leavis???s notion of enactment and his view of the autonomous, active role of language in literature. I conclude that for both, the meaning of literature???s ethical enactments is determined not subjectively but intersubjectively. Literature imposes, and not merely proposes, ethical meaning

Wittgenstein and Leavis: Literature and the Enactment of the Ethical