English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

+ − Table 7: Levels of animacy amd syncretic or distinct argument marking Table 7 relates levels on the animacy hierarchy (see Silverstein 1976) to the distinctiveness of case forms. As can be seen from the numerous levels, a more fine-grained animacy hierarchy was used here, in contrast to Alber & Rabanus (2011). The results below illustrate the advantage of this more fine grained analysis. As can be seen from the residual values, non-HUMAN referents are associated with syncretic forms, while SELF-reference are associated with distinct forms. This association is not unexpected, 12 To find out whether the findings show significant statistical associations, Pearson’s Chi-tests were used. In order not only to figure out whether there is a significant relation between the proto-role, syntactic function and case distinction (which is given in each constellation here, e.g., for syncretism vs. subject/object/agent/patient is: X-squared = 1159.6, df = 6, p-value < 2.2e-16), I do not focus on the p-values, but on the residual values generated for each cell in the cross table. The guidelines for significant deviations are <− 2 for a significantly low association and >+2 for a significantly high association.

Analysing case in spoken language: A corpus study on East Franconian dialects