English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

Both i and u played an important role in the phonetic evolution of many Latin words. The complexity of that evolution is related to the ambiguous phonetic nature of those phonemes, which from the time of ancient grammarians are recognised to have the capacity of acting as either a vowel or a consonant. This double capacity is particularly relevant in contexts where either of them is followed by another vowel forming a hiatus, for the possibility arises of either preserving the hiatus (this is the regular solution of standard Latin: ui.ti.um) or grouping the two vowels into the same syllable (this is the most common solution in substandard Latin: ui.tjum). However, evidence from both classical metre and inscriptions shows that there are two further possible ways of pronouncing those sequences, namely uit.jum (as seen in Vergil’s [Aen. 2.16] ab.ie.te) and ui.t(i)um (with loss of i, u). It is mainly the latter (for convenience we will refer to it as ‘glide

Some neglected evidence on Vulgar Latin ‘glide suppression’: Consentius, 27.17‒20 N.