English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It is unclear how often and in what setting fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panels for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) provide additional information over metaphase cytogenetics alone. Furthermore, the usefulness of peripheral blood vs bone marrow FISH has also not been directly compared. We prospectively compared metaphase cytogenetics and FISH for -5/5q-, -7/7q-, +8, and 20q- in 433 cases of suspected MDS/AML. FISH testing was abnormal in 6 (14%) of 43 and 10 (19%) of 54 cases with fewer than 20 normal metaphases or no growth, respectively. FISH was only rarely abnormal in cases with 20 normal metaphases obtained (6/222 [2.7%]). Comparison of peripheral blood and bone marrow results in 48 cases showed abnormal peripheral blood FISH results in 18 (69%) of 26 cases with abnormal bone marrow FISH results and in 5 (23%) of 22 cases with normal bone marrow FISH results. These findings, the largest published comparison of FISH vs metaphase cytogenetics in MDS/AML, provide a rational strategy for FISH testing in peripheral blood and bone marrow.

american journal of clinical pathology

Diagnostic Yield of Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood FISH Panel Testing in Clinically Suspected Myelodysplastic Syndromes and/or Acute Myeloid Leukemia