English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) reduce the amount of tissue analyzed with the assumption that protein and gene expression patterns are homogeneous throughout tumors. Many tumor types, including glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are heterogeneous in many regards, including cell proliferation. We retrospectively compared Ki-67 labeling indices (LIs) determined by whole tissue section (WTS) vs TMA in a series of 50 GBMs from 45 patients. A paired t test indicated that the difference between average LIs obtained from a TMA vs a WTS was not significant (P = .51). There was no correlation between TMA and WTS (r = 0.042; P = .77), indicating that the methods yielded very different results in individual tumors. The Ki-67 LI did not always correlate with the tissue section in an individual tumor; however, when evaluating a large number of tumors on a TMA, the LI range and mean LI were roughly comparable with the LI range and mean LI determined from the WTS.

Comparison of Proliferation Indices in Glioblastoma Multiforme by Whole Tissue Section vs Tissue Microarray