English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Rachmat HH, Pamoengkas P, Sholihah L, Fambayun RA, Susilowati A. 2020. The effect of planting technique on the growth of two Shorea species in Gunung Dahu, Bogor, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21: 4131-4138. Forest rehabilitation is the counterforce of deforestation and forest degradation. One of the promising strategies for rehabilitating degraded forest land is through replanting of native tree species. Nonetheless, investigation in which planting technique is more effective in supporting plant growth is required in various regional contexts. This study aimed to analyze the growth performance in terms of diameter and height of Shorea leprosula and S. selanica planted in Gunung Dahu Research Forest (GDRF), Bogor, Indonesia treated with total planting and line planting techniques. Diameter and height, as well as environmental factors such as soil texture, average litter thickness, slope, the average thickness of topsoil, and canopy density were observed. Data analysis was performed using ANOVA and followed by Duncan's test. The result showed that line planting was better in accelerating the diameter growth of S. leprosula and S. selanica than total planting. However, planting techniques had no effect on the height growth of both species. The highest growth rate was found in S. selanica treated with line planting with the average diameter and height increment was 1.13 cm/year and 0.78 cm/year, respectively. Line planting also produced higher basal area and stand volume with 0.06 m and 0.64 m per year, respectively for S. leprosula and 0.06 m and 0.66 m per year, respectively for S. selanica.