English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), decision on priorities of alternatives is made based on judgments from a group of individuals. Often these groups are of different backgrounds (social, geographical or gender) and it is of interest to see whether these different backgrounds create any difference in their prioritization of the alternatives in the decision problem. In this article, we develop a categorical data methodology to measure the level of agreement among groups from different backgrounds regarding their priorities on a fixed set of alternatives.

A MEASUREMENT OF AGREEMENT AMONG JUDGES FROM DIFFERENT BACKGROUNDS IN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS