English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

sistant varieties contained a small amount of sugars, whereas the honeydew from susccptible varieties contained O.36% of sugars as glucose which was composed of four kinds of sugars. The results suggested that the Ieafhopper was unable to suck the phloem sap of resistant varieties. Stylet sheaths wcre terminated both in xylem and in sieve tubes on resistant varieties, The proportion of stylct sheaths terminated in the sieve tube was significantly smaller fbr resistant varieties, although the Ieafhopper made more probing punctures, 2,4-3.4・ times as many on resistant varieties as on the susceptible variety, Thus, the number ofstylet sheaths terminated in the sieve tube per unit time became similar for rcsistant and susceptible varieties. It is reasonable to conclude that the antibiosis and non-preference of resistant varieties are responsible fbr the inability of the leafhopper to suck the phloem sap, even when the insect inserts its stylet into the sieve tube.

applied entomology and zoology

Differences in Feeding Habits of the Green Rice Leafhopper, Nephotettix cincticeps UHLER (Hemiptera : Deltocephalidae) : on Resistant and Susceptible Rice Varieties