English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Between 1971 and 1991 we treated 98 patients with giant-cell tumours, 15 of whom presented with a pathological fracture. They were most common around the knee (12). Nine fractures were intra-articular. The tumours were treated by curettage and acrylic cementing (10), excision and endoprosthesis (1), excision and allograft (1), curettage and autologous graft (2) or by resection of the fibular head (1). Four patients had local recurrence, three of whom were cured by repeat curettage and cementing. Pathological fracture through a giant-cell tumour is not a contraindication to treatment by curettage and acrylic cementing.

Giant-cell tumours with fracture at diagnosis. Curettage and acrylic cementing in ten cases