English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In recent decades, there have been clear global tendencies towards decentralization, and rapid growth in the autonomy and responsibilities of subnational governments. As a result of decentralization, a large variety of systems emerged, with different degrees of fiscal, administrative, and political powers given to subnational governments. But what are the arguments for decentralization? Do these arguments work in all systems and circumstances? In Tiebout’s approach, different local governments suggest different tax-expenditure bundles and mobile citizens, the consumer-voters, are supposed to allocate themselves in accordance with their preferences. The Tiebout model is very influential in the contemporary public finance field, however, surprisingly, there have only been a few direct tests of this theory. This paper is devoted to the direct examination of the Tiebout model in the case of the Bayandai district (Irkutsk oblast, Russia).

Global Tendencies to Decentralization and the Provision of Environmental, Educational and Health Services in the Context of Developing Economy