English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this article is to help solve some doctrinal controversies that have been reverberating in the jurisprudence, on whether or not to demand an autonomous request for the exhibition of a document after the validity of CPC/2015, which extinguished the nominee precautionary measures of CPC/73 and instituted the procedure for the anticipated production of proofs, understood as the current consecration of the right to proof. Starting from an analysis of the CPC/73 institutes and passing through the principiological bases of the CPC/2015 reform, three theories about the main theme of the Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual – REDP. Rio de Janeiro. Ano 13. Volume 20. Número 3. Setembro a Dezembro de 2019 Periódico Quadrimestral da Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Direito Processual da UERJ Patrono: José Carlos Barbosa Moreira (in mem.). ISSN 1982-7636. pp. 145-186 www.redp.uerj.br 147 research are presented: (i) the incidental theory; (ii) the autonomous theory; and (iii) differentiated autonomous theory. Defending the autonomous theory, it is maintained that it is possible the presentation of a document by an autonomous demand for exhibition, unrelated to the special rite of the anticipated production of proofs, provided on articles 381 to 383 of the CPC. The anticipated production of documentary evidence can thus take three forms: (i) in a precautionary procedure of an antecedent nature (article 305 of the CPC); (ii) in advance production of proofs; and (iii) in an autonomous document exhibition action, due regard being had to the fungibility among the institutes, when possible and adequate to the useful result of the process.

Produção antecipada de prova ou ação autônoma de exibição de documento: a controvérsia sobre a prova documental no CPC/2015