English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

O objetivo do trabalho e verificar a existencia de experiencias e instrumentos juridicos alternativos a jurisdicao tradicional, capazes de auxiliar na solucao dos conflitos fundiarios discutidos em processos judiciais. Para isso, apresentou-se o debate acerca do conceito e dos elementos do conflito, delimitando-o no âmbito urbanistico, mais especificadamente, dos conflitos fundiarios urbanos estritos. Em segundo momento, foram apresentadas algumas caracteristicas da jurisdicao tradicional, confrontando-as com a realidade urbana, para demonstrar a incompatibilidade do espaco com a solucao de conflitos fundiarios. Ao final, foram demonstradas duas experiencias de aplicacao dos meios alternativos em processos judiciais, assim como, as novas regras previstas no Codigo de Processo Civil, concluindo-se, a partir do metodo estruturalista, que as experiencias sao incipientes, sem qualquer resultado quantitativo e qualitativo expressivo, e que, os instrumentos trazidos pelo CPC, por tratar somente de casos de posse velha, tendem a nao alcancar grande escala de utilizacao. Palavras-chave: Urbanismo. Conflitos Fundiarios. Jurisdicao. Meios Alternativos. Novo CPC. Abstract The objective of this work is to verify the existence of experiences and legal instruments alternative to traditional jurisdiction, capable of assisting in the resolution of land conflicts discussed in legal proceedings. For this, the debate about the concept and the elements of the conflict was presented, delimiting it in the urban area, more specifically, of the strict urban land conflicts. Secondly, some characteristics of the traditional jurisdiction were presented, comparing them with the urban reality, to demonstrate the incompatibility of the space with the solution of land conflicts. In the end, two experiments were carried out on the application of alternative means in judicial proceedings, as well as the new rules foreseen in the Code of Civil Procedure, concluding from the structuralist method that the experiments are incipient, without any quantitative result and qualitative, and that the instruments brought by the CPC, because they deal only with cases of old ownership, tend not to reach large scale of use. Keywords: Urbanism. Land Conflicts. Jurisdiction. Alternative Means. New CPC.

OS CONFLITOS FUNDIÁRIOS URBANOS NO PROCESSO JUDICIAL: POSSIBILIDADES DE APLICAÇÃO DOS MEIOS ALTERNATIVOS PARA A SOLUÇÃO DE CONTROVÉRSIAS