English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

DOI: 10.12957/rdc.2017.29772 Resumen Se esbozan algunas condiciones teoricas necesarias para conceptualizar el juicio democratico lato sensu a partir de determinados conceptos de la teoria del coto vedado, con la finalidad de indagar en las caracteristicas y requisitos para poder calificar de democratico a un proceso jurisdiccional. Se parte de la idea de que los juicios democraticos deben realizarse no solamente en los organos jurisdiccionales electorales, esa seria una idea restringida (o stricto sensu), sino que deben operar en toda actividad jurisdiccional, de ahi su sentido amplio (lato sensu). Se plantea la necesidad de que en toda actividad jurisdiccional influyan aspectos democraticos si se quiere lograr el objetivo social de una eficaz y eficiente imparticion de justicia, para lo cual se consideran algunas categorias de la teoria del coto vedado. Finalmente, para que el juicio democratico lato sensu pueda aplicarse en la realidad se requiere que el juzgador sea democratico cuyas cualidades y caracteristicas tambien se bosquejan desde la referida teoria. Palabras clave: Juicio Democratico; Coto Vedado; Juzgador Democratico; Teoria Democratica. Abstract It outlines some theoretical conditions necessary to conceptualize the democratic judgment lato sensu from certain concepts of the prohibited limits theory, in order to investigate the characteristics and requirements to be able to qualify as democratic a judicial process. It is based on the idea that democratic judgments should be carried out not only in electoral jurisdictions, but rather that it should be a restricted idea (or stricto sensu), but must operate in all jurisdictional activities, hence its large sense (lato sensu). It is proposed that in all jurisdictional activities democratic aspects should be influenced if the social objective of an effective and efficient administration of justice is to be achieved, for which some categories of the prohibited limits theory are considered. Finally, for the democratic judgment lato sensu can be applied in reality requires that the judge is democratic whose qualities and characteristics are also outlined from the said theory. Keywords: Democratic Judgment; Prohibited Limits; Democratic Judge; Democratic Theory.

Hacia una concepción del juicio democrático lato sensu y del juzgador democrático en México desde la teoría del coto vedado