English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

DOI: 10.12957/rdc.2017.27502 A despeito de expressamente prevista na Constituicao de 1988, a usucapiao especial urbana tem sido objeto de importantes dissidencias doutrinarias e jurisprudenciais, sobretudo em sua modalidade coletiva, conforme disciplinada pelo Estatuto da Cidade. Neste cenario, o presente trabalho intenta uma aproximacao teorico-pragmatica das dificuldades de operacionalizacao deste instrumento de regularizacao fundiaria em assentamentos precarios, a partir de estudos de caso de duas acoes judiciais referentes a Vila Sabara e a comunidade Barracao. E possivel vislumbrar, em ambas as experiencias de assessoria juridica popular, as dificuldades do Poder Judiciario para administrar conflitos dessa natureza e envergadura, alem das imprecisoes conceituais envolvendo os requisitos para a aquisicao originaria, as responsabilidades pela urbanizacao e parcelamento das areas de interesse social e instituto do condominio especial. Sugerem-se, ao final, interpretacoes alternativas para dirimir tais impasses e desburocratizar o acesso a justica em nome da concretizacao do direito a cidade. Palavras-chave: assentamentos precarios; usucapiao especial; regularizacao fundiaria; condominio de interesse social; direito a cidade Abstract Although expressly provided by the 1988 Constitution, special urban adverse possession has been the object of important doctrinal and jurisprudential dissent, especially in its collective modality, as disciplined by the City Statute. In this scenario, the present work attempts a theoretical-pragmatic approach to the difficulties of operationalizing this land regularization instrument in precarious settlements, based on case studies of two lawsuits concerning Vila Sabara and the Barracao community. It is possible to envisage, in both experiences of public interest law, the difficulties of the Judiciary to manage conflicts of this nature and scope, in addition to the conceptual inaccuracies involving the requirements for the original acquisition, the responsibilities for urbanization and the subdivision of areas of social interest and special condominium institute. In the end, alternative interpretations are suggested to resolve these impasses and to debureaucratize access to justice in the name of realizing the right to the city. Keywords: precarious settlements; special adverse possession; land regularization; condominium of social interest; Right to the city

revista de direito da cidade

A usucapião especial urbana como instrumento de regularização fundiária plena: desafios para um giro hermenêutico rumo à nova ordem jurídico-urbanística