English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

O presente artigo tem por objetivo refletir acerca dos mecanismos de legitimacao das novas formas de dominacao autoritaria na regiao que emergiram nos anos 60 e 70. Tais formas de governo emergem e se explicam por variaveis que respondem a uma legitimidade historica, politica e socioeconomica. Em tal sentido, tanto a emergencia como o rumo de tais regimes se estabelecem desde uma dinâmica global, para tais efeitos, o seguinte trabalho analisara a estrutura fundacional das novas formas de dominacao autoritaria mediante a explicacao teorico-analitica de legitimacao mista do cientista politico chileno Carlos Huneeus, posteriormente caracterizando cada uma das areas de legitimacao (historica, politica-institucional, economica) entre os casos do Brasil e o Chile. A primeira parte do artigo pode se denominar como um estudo da memria politica dos autoritarismos do Brasil e o Chile mediante uma perspectiva comparada, porem, ao mesmo tempo, se pretende comparar as herancas institucionais que emergem na consolidacao de cada contexto autoritario por meio do que Carlos Huneeus chama de Presidencialismo semisoberano. Promove-se assim um debate acerca dos possiveis limites ao soberano poder que se instauram nos processos autoritarios e sua relacao com o retorno a democracia. Palavras-chave: Legitimacao em contextos autoritarios; Brasil; Chile; Presidencialismo Semisoberano. ABSTRACT This article aims to reflect on the mechanisms for legitimizing the new forms of the authoritarian domination in the south-America in the sixties, seventies and eighties. Such forms of government emerge and are explained by variables that respond to the historical, political and socioeconomic legitimacy. In this sense, both the emergence ant the course of such regimes is established from a global dynamic, for such purposes, the following work will analyze the foundational structure of the new forms of authoritarian domination through the theoretical-analytical explanation of mixed legitimation and that of the political scientist Chilean Carlos Huneeus, later characterizing each of the areas of legitimation (historical, political-institutional, economic) between the cases of Brazil and Chile. The first part of the article can be called a study of the political memory of the authoritarianisms of Brazil and Chile through a comparative perspective, but at the same time, it is intended to compare the institutional inheritances that emerge in the consolidation of each authoritarian context through what Carlos Huneeus calls it semi-sovereign presidentialism. This promotes a debate about the possible limits to the sovereign power that are installed in authoritarian processes and their relationship with the return to democracy.  Keywords: Legitimation in Authoritarian contexts; Brazil; Chile; Semi-Sovereign Presidentialism.

revista neiba

O Autoritarismo Latino-Americano: Uma Discussão Acerca Dos Mecanismos De Legitimação E As Heranças Autoritárias No Brasil (1964-1985) e No Chile (1973-1990)