English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

DOI:  10.12957/dep.2017.27770 Resumo A partir da analise do voto do Ministro Cezar Peluso na ADI no 3.239, bem como de duas decisoes judiciais relacionadas as comunidades de Santana (Rio de Janeiro) e Paiol de Telha (Parana), o artigo discute o papel da justica brasileira nas disputas legais por reconhecimento e titulacao de territorios quilombolas . Defende-se a existencia de uma pluralidade interpretativa do campo judicial acerca do tema, resultado das lutas sociais quilombolas na concretizacao seus direitos identitarios e territoriais. Palavras-chave: quilombolas; poder judiciario; territorio ancestral. Abstract Starting by the analysis of the vote of Justice Cezar Peluso in the ADI number 3.239, as well as the two judicial decisions related to the communities of Santana (Rio de Janeiro) and Paiol de Telha (Parana), the article discusses the Brazilian Justice's role in the legal disputes for recognition and titling of quilombolas territories. It is argued that there are multiple interpretations about this subject in the judicial field, resulting from the quilombolas social struggles in the effectiveness of their identity and territorial rights. Keywords: quilombolas; judiciary, ancestral land.

Sob o rufar dos ng’oma : O judiciário em disputa pelos quilombolas / Under the ng’oma noise: the judiciary in dispute by the quilombolas struggles