English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

DOI: 10.12957/dep.2017.27730 Resumen El presente articulo analiza como la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos ha ido forjando –y expandiendo– el control de convencionalidad, proceso que el autor valora positivamente, lo que no le impide plantear ciertos aspectos que aun resultan problematicos: (i) si la extension del control de convencionalidad a los tribunales nacionales es una nueva prerrogativa o una obligacion preexistente, (ii) si las sentencias de la Corte interamericana tienen efecto erga omnes o inter partes , (iii) la  complejidad y poca accesibilidad de la jurisprudencia interamericana para los tribunales nacionales, y (iv) la invisibilidad de la Comision Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el desarrollo y aplicacion del control de convencionalidad. Palabras-clave : control de convencionalidad; Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos; Comision Interamericana de Derechos Humanos; primacia del derecho internacional. Abstract The present article analyzes how the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has been forging –and expanding– the conventionality control in order to raise certain issues that are still problematic. These are: (i) whether the extension of conventionality control to national courts is a new prerogative or pre-existing obligation, (ii) whether the judgments of the Inter-American Court have erga omnes or inter partes effects, (iii) the complexity and poor accessibility of Inter-American jurisprudence for national courts, and (iv) the invisibility of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in the development and application of conventionality control. Keywords : conventionality control; Inter-American Court of Human Rights; Inter-American Commission on Human Rights; primacy of international law.

revista direito e práxis

Control de convencionalidad interamericano en sede nacional: una noción aún en construcción / Interamerican conventionality control at domestic level: a notion still under construction