English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

DOI:  10.12957/dep.2017.19658 Resumo No presente artigo tem-se como objetivo estabelecer um dialogo intertextual entre o constitucionalismo brasileiro e a obra Critica da Razao Tupiniquim , de Roberto Gomes. Com base em pesquisa bibliografica, que abrangeu tanto a referida obra quanto outras de doutrina especializada em direito constitucional, os aspectos daquilo que Roberto Gomes identificou na area de filosofia no Brasil como ‘razao ecletica’ e ‘razao ornamental’ sao utilizados para analisar o processo constituinte de 1987 e a jurisdicao constitucional brasileira contemporânea. A partir disso, sustenta-se que e possivel vislumbrar tracos da cultura ecletica na forma de atuacao dessas instituicoes brasileiras, bem como propor uma explicacao alternativa, de ordem historico-cultural, para as dificuldades encontradas no enfrentamento do excesso de demandas pelo Poder Judiciario e a baixa uniformizacao de suas decisoes. Palavras-chave: constitucionalismo; critica da razao tupiniquim; jurisdicao constitucional. Abstract This article aims to establish an intertextual dialogue between the constitutionalism doctrine and the work “Critique to Brazilian Reasoning” (Critica a Razao Tupiniquim) published by Roberto Gomes. The study is based on bibliographical research including the mentioned author’s work and also other constitutional law doctrines. The aspects of the points identified by the Brazilian author within the field of philosophy in Brazil are transposed to analyze process to draw up the Brazilian constitution in 1987 and the current Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction. In this article, it was observed that the historical-cultural influence can still be noticed in the Brazilian legal system, as is also a sociologic reasoning for the excessive requirements from the judiciary branch and the challenges that the Brazilian constitutionalism faces. Keywords: constitutionalism; critique to Brazilian reasoning; constitutional jurisdiction.

revista direito e práxis

Constitucionalismo e razão tupiniquim: uma leitura interdisciplinar dos problemas para uma teoria constitucional brasileira / Constitutionalism and “tupiniquim” reasoning: an interdisciplinary overview of the problems for a Brazilian Constitutional Theory