English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

DOI: 10.12957/dep.2016.18867 Resumo Em um dialogo com teorias contemporâneas da democracia, Seyla Benhabib propoe um debate sobre a ideia de pertencimento justo a uma comunidade politica. A partir de uma perspectiva normativa, Benhabib problematiza a definicao de quem seriam os membros de uma comunidade politica e quais seriam os criterios de julgamento moral que as chamadas democracias liberais tem utilizado para definir quem sao os seus cidadaos. O resultado do trabalho de Benhabib parece relevante por oferecer base teorica para a acolhida de solicitantes de asilo, refugiados e apatridas, ao mesmo tempo em que serve de sintese de um modelo de cosmopolitismo liberal. O presente artigo se propoe retomar os argumentos centrais de Benhabib, para, em um segundo movimento, problematiza-los criticamente. Palavras-chave: cosmopolitismo; hospitalidade; cidadania; refugio; apatridia. Abstract In a dialogue with contemporary theories of democracy, Seyla Benhabib proposes a debate on the idea of just membership to a political community. From a normative perspective, Benhabib questions the definition of who would be the members of a political community and what are the moral judgment criteria that the so-called liberal democracies have used to define who are their citizens. The result of Benhabib’s work seems relevant to offer a theoretical basis for the reception of asylum seekers, refugees and stateless persons, while serving as the synthesis of a liberal cosmopolitanism model. This paper intends to approach Benhabib’s central arguments, for, in a second movement, discuss them critically. Key words: cosmopolitism; hospitality; citizenship; asylum; statelessness.

revista direito e práxis

O direito do outro, o outro do direito: cidadania, refúgio e apatridia / The right of the other, the other of the law: citizenship, asylum and statelessness