English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

DOI:  10.12957/dep.2016.17018 Resumo O presente artigo busca estudar o comportamento judicial do Supremo Tribunal Federal no julgamento das acoes diretas de inconstitucionalidade (ADIs) em face das medidas provisorias, durante o periodo de 1988-2011. Neste sentido, a intencao e de diagnosticar qual o poder de veto que o STF se utiliza para barrar ou nao estas politicas, exercitando sua funcao de "accountability" horizontal na separacao de poderes. Palavras-chaves: Supremo Tribunal Federal; poder de veto; medidas provisorias. Abstract This article aims to study the legal behavior of the Brazilian Supreme Court in the trial of the Direct Unconstitutionality Action (ADIs) on the provisory measures during the period 1988-2011. In this sense, the intention of this work is diagnosticate what is the veto power that the Supreme Court uses to prevent or not prevent that policies, practicing its accountability function on the separation of the powers. Independence, political relations and judicial practice of tripartite powers: an analysis of the judgment in the Supreme Court of Direct Unconstitutionality Actions on the power of presidential decree (Provisory Measures). Keywords: Supreme Court; veto power; provisional measures.

revista direito e práxis

O Supremo Tribunal Federal e seu poder contramajoritário sobre as medidas provisórias / The Federal Supreme Court and its counter-majoritarian power over the Provisional Measures