English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article makes a comparative analysis of the caselaw between the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights to verify how questions of political representation are dealt with in multicultural contexts. For this purpose, I discuss the theoretical debate on political representation in multicultural societies, followed by analysis of the caselaw from the two Courts regarding the theme, focusing on cases involving political parties. Then I answer the following questions: Is the caselaw from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights permeated by a multicultural vision of the law? Are there differences between the ways the two Courts deal with political representation in multicultural societies? Is it possible to classify the relevant judgments of the Courts according to some contemporary political philosophy? After responding to these questions, I present a comparative theoretical and jurisprudential discussion.  Este artigo fara uma analise comparativa entre a jurisprudencia da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos e a Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos com o fim de verificar como questoes de representacao politica sao tratadas em contextos multiculturais. Para tanto, discutirei acerca do debate teorico sobre representacao politica em sociedades multiculturais e, em seguida, analisarei a jurisprudencia das duas cortes sobre o tema, com o foco em casos que envolvam partidos politicos. Depois, responderei as seguintes perguntas: As jurisprudencias da Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos e da Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos sao permeadas por uma visao multicultural do Direito? Ha diferenca entre a forma como as duas cortes lidam com a representacao politica em sociedades multiculturais? E possivel classificar os julgamentos relevantes dessas duas cortes de acordo com alguma vertente da filosofia politica contemporânea? Apos responder a essas perguntas, discutirei comparativamente questoes teoricas e jurisprudenciais.

revista ballot

A comparative study of jurisprudence, between the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and European Court of Human Rights, regarding political representation in multicultural contexts