English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

To investigate whether intrusive advising is effective for nontraditional students at an urban comprehensive university, we compared it with prescriptive advising in a 3-year trial of randomly selected psychology undergraduates (N = 126). We hypothesized that advisees in the intrusive track would feel more satisfied, more connected to the department, and be more academically successful than those in the prescriptive track. Secondary questions concerned the relationship of advising preferences and demographic characteristics. Students receiving intrusive advising reported greater satisfaction with advising, felt more connected to the department, but were not more academically successful than those in the prescriptive track.

A Comparison of Intrusive and Prescriptive Advising of Psychology Majors at an Urban Comprehensive University