English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Basel II simultaneously introduced a regulatory framework for operational risk and shifted the regulatory focus from top-down to bottom-up governance, prompting increased reliance on self-evaluation and market discipline. In this paper we assess the relevance of market discipline to regulation of operational risk and the implications of voluntary disclosure. We study the development, determinants and quality of operational risk disclosure in the Nordic banking sector following the implementation of Basel II. Our results reveal that the extent of disclosure has increased and that size is the main determinant. However, the quality of operational risk disclosure is poor and it does not assist stakeholders' evaluation of banks' operational risk. Based on our results, we discuss whether disclosure studies can capture quality in terms of content, the impact of regulation on banks of different sizes and whether market discipline is an effective regulatory effort to reduce bank risk.

New Experiences from Voluntary Risk Disclosures. Operational Risk in Nordic Banks