English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of hysteroscopic tubal electrocoagulation versus laparoscopic tubal disconnection for management of hydrosalpinx related infertility among patients undergoing ICSI. The sample of the study was 100 patients. Half of the patients underwent hysteroscopic tubal electocoagulation who have laparoscopic contraindications, while the other half underwent laparoscopic tubal disconnection. After tubal occlusion was done, an ICSI cycle was startedwith assessment of chemical pregnancy rate. The rate of positive chemical pregnancy was 50 % in hysteroscopic group and 58% in laparoscopic group, so hysteroscopic tubal electrocoagulation was found to be a successful treatment for hydrosalpinges before ICSI when laparoscopy is contraindicated with chemical pregnancy rate comparable to laparoscopic tubal disconnection.

Comparison of ICSI Outcomes in Patients with Hydrosalpinx Pretreated with Either Laparoscopic Tubal Disconnection or Hysteroscopic Tubal Occlusion