English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper presents the analysis of the rulings of the Argentinian labor justice in cases of violence and workplace harassment against women. The main thesis argues that the labor judiciary reproduces the dynamics of sexist domination by not adapting the parameters of the judicial approach to the international standards regarding the protection of women’s rights. For this, we will explore a sample of jurisprudence of the National Chamber of Labor Appeals in which we will address two main issues: the conceptions of violence against women at work and the configuration of the evidence and distribution of the probation burden. Then, we contrast these findings with the main contributions of legal feminism and the current standards in women’s international human rights.

Abordaje de la violencia laboral contra las mujeres en la justicia ordinaria laboral argentina